Restoring the Original Intent of the Second Amendment: An Unfulfilled Promise
Several recent events in the United States have reignited a debate about the interpretation and protection of the Second Amendment. Many argue that the current constitutional framework needs adjustment to fully restore the rights as originally intended by the Founding Fathers. This article explores why such a restoration is both desirable and necessary.
Why It Is Desirable to Fully Restore Second Amendment Rights as Originally Intended
In many countries, policies aligned with the will of the people typically prevail. However, it is often contended that the United States is an exception to this norm. Why is it desirable for the American people to be governed by principles and intentions established by the Founding Fathers, rather than the choices made by their representatives?
The answer lies in the very foundation of the American democracy. Rights, by definition, belong to the people and are a collective experience. They are not handed down by external bodies but are the birthright of every citizen. Thus, the sovereignty of the people demands that their rights are upheld and protected by those chosen to represent them.
When rights are not protected, they are ultimately abandoned. Unprotected rights lose their meaning and value to the people, leading to their eventual erosion. Accepting and obeying infringements on these rights makes them null and void. Protection and enforcement of rights are not merely legal niceties but fundamental duties of every citizen. Accepting violations is tantamount to betraying the very essence of what it means to be an American.
No Constitutional Amendments Would Be Required for Full Restoration
Contrary to the common belief that several constitutional amendments are necessary to restore the original intent of the Second Amendment, the solution lies in political action rather than legal reforms. The current power imbalance between political parties makes it imperative to address the root cause through electoral changes.
Democrats, who often support policies limiting gun rights, must be removed from all state and federal legislatures if full Second Amendment rights are to be restored. This is not an ideal or wishful thinking; it is a clear and practical solution.
Enforcement of Constitutional Duties
Constitutional rights are not just words on paper but serve as a framework for governmental behavior. The President and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have a duty to enforce this constitution. If they fail in this responsibility, it is the duty of Congress and the people to ensure they are held accountable. Treason should be the charge if elected officials deliberately violate their oath of office.
Limitations on State Governments
This restoration does not come without exceptions. The Founding Fathers envisioned the Bill of Rights as a limitation on federal power rather than state power. Therefore, to allow state governments to ban guns if they so choose, constitutional amendments would be required. This is a crucial distinction that warrants careful consideration.
Restoring the original intent of the Second Amendment is not only about firearms but about the spirit of liberty and self-determination that defines the United States. Only through active participation, elections, and adherence to the constitution can this promise be fulfilled.