The Real Name Behind the Left’s Approach to Political Correctness
There is a persistent narrative that the left dodges the term political correctness for fear of being labeled as self-censoring or bullied. However, this narrative is a misrepresentation and misses the actual practices and values underlying the left's advocacy for dignity and respect for all individuals.
Why Does the Left Avoid Calling Political Correctness by Its Name?
It's essential to understand that the term political correctness has been co-opted to create a false dichotomy between being considerate and speaking freely. In reality, the left's stance is about treating all humans with dignity, particularly those who do not have the same privileges as others.
For example, ethnic slurs and mocking people with disabilities or mental illness dehumanize and intentionally degrade individuals. This is a part of the right's rhetoric, where exploiting others is seen as elevating one's own status. This is not to say that the left avoids using the term political correctness; instead, they recognize that behind the term lies the principle of respect. When you say "with respect," it clearly exposes the intentions of those who deride proper language.
Understanding Political Correctness: A Defense of Human Dignity
The left understands that the term political correctness is an abusive label for a set of practices that are fundamentally about ensuring that everyone has equal opportunities to participate in public life. These practices oppose statements that exclude people based on their identity, even if such exclusionary views are held.
Two primary reasons for the opposition to political correctness are commonly cited, but both can be effectively debunked:
1. The Prescription of Restricting Free Speech
One argument against political correctness is that it imposes unjustified limits on free speech. The assertion is that certain statements are presumed harmful to identity groups. However, American law does recognize limitations on free speech, such as libel or incitement to imminent lawless action.
The First Amendment does not guarantee immunity for all speech; it prohibits government action against speech that is not protected under these exceptions. Private individuals and groups are not forced to countenance statements contrary to their own policies, which debunks the idea that political correctness imposes unreasonable burdens on free speech.
2. Unjust Punishment for Political Correctness Offenses
The second argument suggests that political correctness imposes social or professional penalties for statements deemed politically incorrect. Again, while this is a concern, it is not a problem unique to political correctness. Private individuals and groups can independently choose to impose penalties for speech they find disagreeable.
At the heart of these arguments is the defense of personal liberty and equality. The left does not seek to restrict the rights of individuals to speak freely but to ensure that everyone's dignity is respected and that no one is excluded on the basis of identity.
The Nature of Political Correctness: A Cornerstone of Democratic Principles
The practices often labeled as political correctness are means by which individuals with less power can exert influence to defend their interests. This is a crucial aspect of democratic politics, where the voices of the marginalized, historically disadvantaged, and minorities are heard.
Political correctness can be described as a set of methods by which the downtrodden use their allies and resources to defend their rights and ensure fair representation. This is a key component of a consistent defense of popular politics, which must include allowing these measures.
Conclusion
The term political correctness is often misused and misunderstood. It does not inherently limit free speech nor impose unjust punishments. Instead, it is about treating all individuals with the dignity and respect they deserve. The left's real name is not to avoid the term but to ensure that all people have equal opportunities to participate in public life and to be heard without prejudice.