U.S. Embargo on Cuba: A Sign of Force or Genuine Safety Visa?
When the U.S. enforces a ban on trips and contacts to Cuba, does it truly enhance the safety of the United States? Beyond the added burden on the people of Cuba and inconvenience for American citizens, what are the tangible benefits of this policy?
The Cuban Perspective on Normalization of Relations
The current stance by the U.S. implies that normalization of relations with Cuba, including the removal of travel restrictions, will only occur if the Cuban government ceases to imprison political dissenters. This condition reflects a significant distrust and lack of willingness to engage with Cuba on a more equal footing. However, it is important to note that Cuba has significant reasons to seek normalized relations, primarily due to its economic needs.
Cuba is in dire need of normal trade and relations with the U.S., especially given the billions of dollars owed for properties expropriated in 1960. These debts, related to actions such as Exxon’s oil refinery being seized, remain unresolved, thereby preventing the full normalization of relations.
The Impact and Purpose of the Embargo
The U.S. embargo on Cuba is often justified on the grounds of enhancing the safety of the United States. However, a closer examination reveals that the true intent may be more political than security-driven. It serves as a form of punishment and a display of strength, particularly within the context of opposing leftist governments and promoting right-wing regimes in the region.
From a practical standpoint, the embargo restricts the flow of dollars into the Cuban government, which it can then use internationally for various purposes, including purchasing necessary goods like gasoline. When an American tourist visits Cuba with U.S. dollars, the conversion to Cuban currency often occurs through the black market, further funneling capital into the regime's coffers.
Global Implications
The embargo is not just an isolated policy affecting Cuba. It is part of a larger strategy within a network of "evil states" like Russia, Venezuela, Iran, Syria, and North Korea. These states seek to undermine the United States and engage in nefarious activities, and the embargo aims to restrict their access to dollars.
These states rely heavily on dollars for their economic transactions, and the embargo severely limits their ability to acquire them. The restriction on dollars is particularly impactful because it hampers their ability to fund operations, such as purchasing weapons or engaging in illegal activities like drug trafficking and corruption.
Corruption and the Desire for Dollars
The analysis of the embargo's effects also reveals that many of these nations have corruption as a primary driver for seeking dollars. The embargo works in tandem with their corrupt systems, making it harder for them to launder money through legitimate channels. They are interested in dollars to stow away in Swiss bank accounts, purchase luxury homes and cars, and fund other luxurious items as well as weapons and women.
Conclusion
While the U.S. embargo on Cuba aims to enhance its safety, the reality appears to be more complex. The policy is primarily a tool of geopolitical leverage and punishment rather than a genuine safety measure. Normalizing relations with Cuba, as the U.S. should seriously consider due to economic needs and unresolved debts, could provide a more sustainable and effective approach.
As we strive for a better understanding of international relations, it is crucial to examine and reassess policies like the U.S. embargo on Cuba, focusing on their true impact and purpose. The safety and mutual benefit of all nations should guide these efforts, rather than a simplistic display of power.